Register

Welcome to the Aloloom English Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the Forum Rules by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Results 1 to 28 of 28
  1. #1

    Is Ubayd al-Jaabiree fit to give fatwa?


    Ash-Shaykh Albany, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:


    "I have reached the age of seventy-four while I fear upon myself the temptation of women, so how can one give a fatwa for the youth to study or work in free-mixing? Allahu Musta'aan."
    Reference silsilatul huda wan noor , tape number 211.

    As for Ubayd al-Jaabiree then he permits both studying and working in free-mixing, Our noble Shaykh Yahya has mentioned many times that Ubayd al-Jaabiree is not proper to give fatwa.

    http://aloloom.net/vb/showthread.php?t=9194


    To listen to the fatwa of Ubayd's on free-mixing in schooling click the thread below:

    http://aloloom.net/upload/om/obeed/obaid_ekhtlat.mp3


    To read the fatwa of Ubayd on free-mixing at work click the thread below:

    http://www.aloloom.net/vb/showthread.php?t=2136


  2. #2

    Whoever marries his daughter to the people of Bid'ah has cut off family ties with her (Fudail Ibn Iyyaad)

    Also read some of the speech of our Noble Shaykh Yahya regarding getting married to an innovator:

    http://sh-yahia.net/show_books_39.html

    After reading above it becomes clear the incorrectness of the fatwa below:

    Question: A Salafee sister wants to get married. She has been trying for a long time, and has been unsuccessful in finding a prospective Salafee husband. Can she marry a non-Salafee?

    Answer: “If he is a person who shows hatred and fights Ahlul-Sunnah, then stay away! If he doesn’t show enmity, then it is okay to marry him BUT with a condition. The condition is that he lets her go and study from the people of the Sunnah.”

    By the Noble Shaykh ‘Ubayd ibn ‘Abdullah al-Jaabiree (Hafitha-hullaah)
    Translated by Umm ‘Abdir-Rahmaan Hanim Say
    Telelink from Toronto, Canada to al-Madeenah, Kingdom of Saudi ‘Arabia
    14 Rabi’ Awwal 1425 | 4 May 2004


  3. #3

    Below is a previous fatwa for Ubayd al-Jaabiree where (he permits seeking knowlege under al-Halabee for those who reside in his country) but at the same he gave a fatwa that seeking knowledge in Damaaj is not allowed.

    Ubayd al-Jaabiree said:
    "...I advise that the people do not go to him from outside (his country) as for those who are residing in his country then it seems that they are in need of him, while they are actually in need of who is lower than him of what he possess because we do not know of any scholar after Albany in his country who is returned back to, to his opinions , fatwas and rulings, even now I do not no of anyone..."
    For the full fatwa return to the thread below
    http://aloloom.net/vb/showthread.php?t=3119


  4. #4

    Ubaid al-Jaabiree mentioned in a recording consisting of question and answers from Libya dated on the 16th of September 2011 (this month):


    "I say, Yusuf Salallahu 'alayhi wasallam used to work under the protection of Azeez of Egpyt; and Azeez of Egypt was a Kaafir, so Yusuf Salallahu alayhi wasallam would not establish complete justice but used to establish what he was able to..."


    Please click below to hear the recording:

    http://www.islamup.com/download.php?id=137374

    Posted by Ehsan bin Manzoor



  5. #5

    قال شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمة رحمه الله في " الفتاوى الكبرى" : (( وقد كان يوسف عليه السلام عادلاً لا يمكنه أن يأخذهم بغير حجة . . . )) اهـ . و نقل كلام شيخ الإسلام تلميذه البار به الإمام ابن القيم رحمه الله في " إعلام الموقعين " .


    Here shaikhul Islaam said he was 'aadil, just, and so he clears it up for people like Ubaid who claimed the OPPOSITE of what shaikh al Islaam said, their claim that Nabee Yoosuf sallallaahu 'alayhi wasallam did not have complete justice.

    Posted by Mohsin Syed

    Shaykh Rabee’ on the issue of the Prophet Yoosuf ‘alaihis-salaam establishing justice


    Excerpts from the English translation of Shaykh Rabee' bin Hadee's book "Manhaj al'Anbiya fee Da'wat ilallaah" available on the official website of the shaykh


    So from the knowledge to be learned from the life-story of Yoosuf, ’alayhis-salaam, which is presented to us in those noble Aayaat is that the call to tawheed is something very essential. Furthermore there is to be no leniency or relaxation in fighting against shirk, it is not permissible to keep silent about it, whatever the circumstances of the caller to Allaah; rather it is not permissible for any Muslim to ever accept it or be relaxed about it. So this shows the high station of ‘aqeedah, and its importance with Allaah, and with His Prophets and His Messenger. It also shows the very great difference and the distance between it and the details of Islaam.

    It is not permissible for the Muslim, particularly the caller, to take up any position which violates his ‘aqeedah or is contrary to it, or that he is a fortune-teller, those who are Mushriks, or that he is a custodian of their idols. If he does any of this then he is one of the misguided Mushriks. With regard to the legislative aspect, if the Islamic state is established, it must apply the Sharee'ah of Allaah, otherwise:

    { ومن لم يحكم بما أنزل الله فأولئك هم الكافرون}

    “And whoever does not judge by what Allaah has revealed then they are the ones guilty of unbelief.”

    The unbelief (kufr) here is explained in detail by the scholars of Islaam, from the Companions and others, that it may be major Kufr, when the person disdains the Sharee'ah of Allaah and declares it lawful to judge by something else, and it may be lesser Kufr (i.e., that which does not take a person out of Islaam) when he does not declare it lawful to judge by other than it, but gives in to his desires and because of that judges by other than what Allaah sent down.

    However when the Islamic state has not been established, then Allaah does not a burden a soul with more than it is capable of. So the Muslim may take up a position in a non-Muslim state with the condition that he establishes justice, and that he does not obey them ina matter which involves disobedience to Allaah, and does not judge by other than what Allaah sent down. This was what the Prophet of Allaah, Yoosuf, did. He took up a position as a deputy for a unbelieving king, and he did not judge according to his laws:

    {ما كان ليأخذ أخاه في دين الملك}

    “He could not have taken and kept his brother according to the king’s law.”

    Furthermore, he established justice between the subjects and called them to the tawheed of Allaah.
    Posted by Ahmad Nishwan
    Last edited by AbuFajr AbdulFattaah bin Uthman; 06-24-2012 at 07:13 AM.

  6. #6

    Ubaid Al-Jaabiree’s Clear Permitting of Innovation



    Questioner: a youth has been requested that he be an Imaam and Khateeb of a Masjid in his land and from the conditions (that are made upon him) is that he adheres to this nomination with the following affairs:1



    1o Congregational Dua after every prayer



    2o Al-Qunoot at ever Fajar prayer



    These are related to the prayer.1



    As for what relates to sermons…then for example, if Jum’ah falls on the same day as the innovation of celebrating the prophet’s birthday, then he is requested to deliver a sermon on this subject - i.e. call to it and not mention that it is a Bid’ah and like this…, bearing in mind that if he does not fulfil these conditions then he will encounter great harm from the general authority of endowments, or from other security services, if this youth does not accept this nomination, then he will be replaced with another youth that apposes the Sunnah and…..1



    Ubaid Al-Jaabiree(interjects rudely): Do not prolong yourself, may Allah bless you, this is the problem with you guys, (you have a) problem of prolonging.1



    Questioner: Na’am Yaa Shaykh, may Allah bless you…1



    Ubaid Al-Jaabiree: I say, as for that which relates to the birthday, Ya’ni he can mention the birthday of the prophet Salallahu ‘Alayhi wasallam, and he can mention its date, and that….he should come with equivocation, and not discuss the birthday, he should not discuss the birthday, he should exalt the birthday of the messenger Salallahu ‘Alayhi Wassallam, and that he is the leader of mankind, ya’ni he should use equivocation.1



    As for that which relates to the Qunoot in the Fajar prayer, and congregational Du’a, he should make Qunoot quietly, and make a brief Qunoot, and as for congregational Du’a, then he should make brief supplications, and according to what has reached me, a man from your country had informed me that it is not compulsory (to make Du’a) every day, if he leaves it off some days then there’s no problem with it.1



    Questioner: However Yaa Shaykh, may Allah bless you, as you have mentioned yourself, it is not in every land (that they make Du’a after every prayer compulsory), however in some places and not in others Yaa Shaykh?1



    Ubaid Al-Jaabiree: Ya’ni, what can he do? The fact that he has some control over this (place) and the fact that he is on his own in the Masjid teaching the people the Sunnah, it is better for him (to stay) than to leave, and that another innovator comes!1



    Questioner: may Allah bless you oh Shaykh, even if they compel him to shave his beard and have his clothes below his ankles Yaa Shaykh?1



    Ubaid Al-Jaabiree: No! As for shaving the beard then no!1



    Questioner: so he should leave if they compel him with that Yaa Shaykh?1



    Ubaid Al-Jaabiree: Yes, yes if they request him to shave his beard then he should not do it.1



    Questioner: May Allah bless you Yaa Shaykh.1



    SECOND QUESTION



    Questioner: a youth works in a bank based upon interest, so is it permissible for this youth to…?1



    Ubaid Al-Jaabiree (interjects rudely): this brother Ya’ni what about him?….what is his work in the bank?1



    Questioner: he works in a bank, in a bank based on interest.1



    Ubaid Al-Jaabiree:what is his work, what does he do?1



    Questioner: Wallaahi Yaa Shaykh, may Allah bless you I do not know.1



    Ubaid Al-Jaabiree (interjects rudely): so you have asked about something you do not know of….? Banks based upon interest have jobs that are not considered interest, various jobs, so based upon this, if the brothers wages are Halaal then you may eat and drink with him.1



    Questioner: he (wants) to borrow money from his brother to buy a car and to have a wedding Yaa Shaykh?1



    Ubaid Al-Jaabiree: There is no harm.1

    Posted by Ehsan bin Manzoor

  7. #7

    'Ubayd Bin Abdullah Al-Jaabiree was asked:
    1


    Question: May Allah reward you with good! (we seek an answer regarding) Television for the children in to let them to watch cartoons, because we have heard a Fatwaa giving permission for this, if it is free from music and issues that are unsuitable in regards to belief, bearing in mind that if the television is not avaliable for them, they will go to the neighbours house to watch it

    Answer:
    1

    This question has an answer;
    1

    Then we say that whoever Allah has cured from the presence of the television and its consiquences , then there is no doubt that he is in a state of happiness due to that. And whoever needs it for the children so they can show them cartoons or channels that have beneficial religious programs that prevents them from the immorality of the neighbours, as he is not able to to be in control of what goes on inside as he is just the neighbour, and the neighbours are afflicted with things except he who Allah has mercy upon, the children watch morally deprived films, listen to music and shameless songs. Then (in this situation) he is compelled and there is no harm in it InshaAllah

    Posted by Abul-Layth


  8. #8

    Questioner
    : May Allah reward and bless you, what does a student that is obliged to attend a music lesson do, that which is ___ (TN two words from the questioner are unclear, due to the sound)?1



    Ubaid al-Jaabiree: if he is able to remove himself from it and not attend, even if he has to pay a fee, then I see it to be obligatory for him to do that, and if he is not able then let his heart be at rest with Eeman, let him hate it, he attends and hates it with his heart, for the sake of Allah.1


    Questioner: May Allah reward you!1


    Below is the link for his disgusting Fatwa


    http://www.4shared.com/audio/IfGkD0l7/___online.html

    Posted by Ehsan bin Manzoor




  9. #9

    بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

    "The Victory for the Creed of the Muwahhideen (the people of Tawheed), in the Refutation of Ubaid al Jaabiree in his Fatwaa Allowing to ask the Magicians to Undo their Magic Spells on Those who have been Affected by Magic"


    Written by Aboo Haatim Yoosif bin al-Eed bin Saalih al-'Anabee al-Jazaairee, may Allaah preserve him


    Read and permitted to be spread by the noble shaykh, al-muhaddith, al-allaamah

    Aboo Abdur Rahmaan Yahyaa bin Alee al Hajooree may Allaah preserve him.


    All praise and thanks are due to Allaah, we seek His Help and we seek His Forgiveness. We seek refuge with Him from the evil of our souls and the evil of our actions. Whosoever Allaah guides then none can misguide him, and whosoever Allaah leaves to stray then none can guide him. I bear witness that there is none worthy of worship save Allaah, the One Who has no partner and we bear witness that Muhammad (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) is his servant and Messenger.

    "O mankind! Be dutiful to your Lord, Who created you from a single person (Adam), and from him (Aadam) He created his wife [Hawwa (Eve)], and from them both He created many men and women and fear Allaah through Whom you demand your mutual (rights), and (do not cut the relations of)the wombs (kinship. Surely, Allaah is Ever an AllWatcher over you." [Sooratun-Nisaa', 4:1]
    "O you who believe! Fear Allaah (by doing all that He has ordered and by abstaining from all that He has forbidden) as He should be feared. [Obey Him, be thankful to Him, and remember Him always], and die not except as Muslims (with complete submission to Allaah.)" [Soorah Aali-Imraan 3:102]
    "O you who believe! Keep your duty to Allaah and fear Him, and speak (always) the truth. He will direct you to do righteous good deeds and will forgive you your sins. And whosoever obeys Allaah and His Messenger, he has indeed achieved a great achievement (i.e. he will be saved from the Hell-fire and made to enter Paradise). [Sooratul-Ahzaab 33:70-71]

    Regarding what follows,


    So Allaah has stated in his Noble Book,

    Is he, then, to whom the evil of his deeds made fairseeming, so that he considers it as good (equal to one who is rightly guided)? Verily, Allaah sends astray whom He wills, and guides whom He wills. So destroy not yourself (O Muhammad sallallaahu ‘alayhi wasallam) in sorrow for them. Truly, Allaah is the All-Knower of what they do! (Faatir 35:8)


    And the Most High has stated:

    Have you seen him who takes his own lusts (vain desires) as his ilaah (god), and Allaah knowing (him as such), left him astray, and sealed his hearing and his heart, and put a cover on his sight. Who then will guide him after Allaah? Will you not then remember? (Al-Jathiyah 45:23)


    Al Allaamah as-Sa'dee, may Allaah the Exalted have mercy upon him, has stated regarding this aayah:


    The Most High has stated "Have you seen" the misguided individual who "takes his own lusts/desires as his ilaah (God)." So what desires he pursued; it is equal to him (it does not matter to him) whether he pleases Allaah or angers Him, "and Allaah knowing (him as such), left him astray," from Allaah the Most High, verily it is not worthy for him to be granted guidance, and there will be no praise for him, "and sealed his hearing" So he will not listen to that which benefits him, "and his heart" and he will not become aware of or understand the good, "and put a cover on his sight" and he will be prevented from seeing the truth, "Who then will guide him after Allaah?" Which is no one will be able to guide him (except Allaah), and Allaah has already shut the doors of guidance upon him and has opened the doors of (his) giving in to the desires, and Allaah has not wronged him, but he is the one who wronged himself, and it has caused the prevention of the mercy of Allaah upon him. "Will you not then remember" What benefits you, you all will pursue it, and what harms you, you will all avoid it.’


    And from the ones who have become a victim of his desires, becoming near to laxity and recklessness, and from those who have become allied to the khudhlaan(those who forsake the truth and its people), and devoid of success, and yet increasing day after day upon this same path (of desires), is Ubaid al Jaabiree, may Allaah guide him. He is an instigator of trials, and a helper of the hizbiyeen (partisans) in Yemen. He is one who shows hostilty towards the fortress of knowledge and guidance, (Daar al Hadeeth) in Dammaaj, with several different types of enmity, such as with controversies, argumentation with falsehood.


    This man is the one who declared war on the people of sunnah in this esteemed fortress of salafiyyah. Allaah the Exalted shamed those (who attacked Daar al Hadeeth Dammaaj) for this, and then Allaah the Exalted exposed them. As we have known, and what is known to every salafee, that it (Daar al Hadeeth Dammaaj) is a fortress of salafiyyah. Truly no one expresses his enmity towards it except one from the people who have lowly, worthless views,or (who follow) the methodologies of falsehood, or through envious desires. So the news was spread, and the result became their agreeing upon this as the reality that was increased upon day after day.

    And what is this evil, corrupt fatwaa except an example of this, where al-Jaabiree passed a fatwaa in which he allows asking the witches/magicians to undo their magic spells on those who have been affected by magic. And what becomes apparent here is how far off he is from correctly understanding the proofs from the Qur'aan and the Sunnah, and understanding the legislation and its foundations that the rulings are based upon. And it shows the doubts and uncertainty in pursuing the path of establishing rulings upon the authentic evidences and building rulings upon the revelation and the methodology of the righteous predecessors.


    And we are going to bring forth-by the permission of Allaah- a refutation against this dangerous fatwaa in brief, intending by this the clarification of the falsehood in this fatwaa, with the evidences and the compiled statements of the a‘immah (imaams), in order to understand the well-known and acknowledged, correct understanding, upholding the tawheed of the Lord of all the creation, and aiding the people of tawheed. And Allaah is the One Who grants success upon the truth.


    Download the entire original arabic refutation here (63 pages):
    http://www.aloloom.net/show_book.php?id=371


    Click here to hear the deviant fatwaa of al-Jaabiree: http://www.aloloom.net/upload/om/SEHR%20.mp3


    Ubayd Al-Jabiree said in this audio clip:
    “... go to the one who put magic on you and request from him that he cures or removes his magic from you...”

    More info: http://aloloom.net/vb/showthread.php?p=29979

    Posted by Mohsin Syed


  10. #10

    We apologize for the delay in this translation, but we are resuming working on it inshaa-Allaah

    http://www.aloloom.net/show_book.php?id=371


    Ubaid al Jaabiree allows going to a magician who performed magic spells on someone and asking him to undo the magic


    Part 2: The text of the question and fatwaa given



    The questioner asks: I was affected by magic and the plotting of an envious person, and I lost my job and my wealth, and recently my wife started to hate me with severe hatred, so I started to get treatment- praise be to Allaah- and it is known that I am upright praise be to a Allaah.


    The first question: is it permissible for me to kill the magician after I have known who has done this work with the knowledge that there is no law that prohibits magic?


    The second question
    : is it permissible for me to ask him to undo his magic?



    The third question: is my wife is a sinner after she knew about my illness and the reason that we have become separated, and she did not stay on my side? [This] with the knowledge that the people of good tried to reconcile between us but they were unable to?


    I hope that you pray for me to get well and I hope that Allaah joins me with my wife. May Allaah reward you with good.



    Ubaid al Jaabiree, may Allaah guide him, answered: Do not be harsh upon your wife because I believe that the work of magic has affected her as it has affected you. Secondly, it is not permissible for you to kill the magician, and if you are truthful in your claim that such and such person performed magic on you, and you have proof, then you should raise this issue to the legal circles in your country, and I don't believe except that they will do justice for you and they will give back your rights.


    Lastly, if you know this magician with complete knowledge and you have clear proofs (that it was him) or you know that he will admit to performing magic on you,then ask him personally to undo the magic on you. And if you pay him money (for this purpose), this is permissible for you inshaa-allaah. And this is not a general rule. Don't think that I am giving a ruling that allows undoing magic by magic at all, we seek refuge in Allaah.


    I repeat again if we know that Fulaan performed magic (specifically) on ‘Amr (a certain person) and we are able to, then we should ask Fulaan (the magician) to undo the magic on whom? On ‘Amr. And this is from the the perspective of requesting the person who has done harm to correct what he has done, but it is not a general rule; and I hope that you do not spread from me. I do not give the ruling that it is permissible to undo magic by magic. No, this ruling is limited by certain conditions, and I don’t believe except that you understand this. Is it clear? Yes


    COMING SOON INSHAA-ALLAAH


    Part 3: The refutation based on the evidences from the book of Allaah, the sunnah of rasoolillaah sallallaahu'alayhi wasallam, and the statements of the salaf as saalih.


    Posted by: Mohsin


  11. #11

    Attached below is a sound clip in the Arabic language of Ubayd Al-Jaabiree declairing the statement that he gave permission to trim the beard as being a lie! immediatley afterwards is the audio of him giving permission to trim it.

    Listen from here

  12. #12

    Attached is a clip of Ubayd Al-Jaabiree declairing studying in a free mixed environment to be prohibited, but teaching in a free mixed environment is permissible

    Listen from here


  13. #13
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Rural California, USA
    Posts
    153

    From our Shaykh the Muhaddith, the trustworthy advisor, Abu Abulrahman Yahya Ibn Ali Al Hajooree (May allah Preserve Him)

    "And from the wonders of the affairs O brothers! How you will see: He who transgresses the truth an abuses it! His sayings will slip, and he will collapse. And likewise he will not be precise, and he will become a ridicule!

    Ubayd Al Jabiree: He warns from Dammaj! A land of Islam. Yemen is a land of Islam, and a place of knowledge and sunnah. "So leave oh people of Europe!" So, He (Ubayd al Jabiree) informs those who are there (Europe) not to come (to dammaj) and those who are here (dammaj) to leave?

    Europe and other than it. Birmingham, UK.......IS A LAND OF KUFR! And the Masaajid there are Barelevi....and Deobandi and the masajid of ahlul hadeeth, ahlul hadeeth in relation to Ihyaa Turath.

    Then Ubayd comes along and urges the people to make hijrah. That the people of Europe should make hijrah to...BIRMINGHAM (shaykh laughs).

    Oh, what wonders, the darul Hadeeth Al salafiyyah (dammaj), In a land of Islam, He urges the people to leave it and th disparaging of (dammaj) and rejecting (dammaj) from the westerners and other than them.

    Birmingham is a land of KUFR! And for this reason we have spoken in this as a lesson. For the one who thinks about this! By Allah it is a lesson. A LESSON!

    A student requests to speak. Shaykh: Yes

    Students: Words unclear

    Shaykh: What, they have a church next to them? "A land of HIJRAH!" (students laughs). The people make hijrah next to churches. But dammaj has no churches, a Land of Islam a land of Dawah yet they say leave it, flee from it, but that is a land of Hijrah?

    And my intent with this is the one who transgresses against the truth will SLIP, May alah bless you, I swear BY my Lord! And he will become blind. (Shaykh asks his students) In which surat does Allah Mighty Majestic say: And we shall turn their hearts and their eyes away (from guidance), as they refused to believe therein for the first time....and we shall leave them in their trespass to wander blindly" Yes? (students answer: Al An'aam)`Shaykh: That is Correct! And in Allah help is sought.

    It is not amazing from Ubayd's speech with all this charge in his heart, Think about what is more severe than this, What is more amazing than this...Why is Ubayd's speech not REJECTED? With all his (ubayd)wonders... why should we not refute him? ? Okay! May Allah give you all life! End of shaykh's words

    May Allah mighty Majestic preserve our Shaykh, the Imam, the Mujahid, The allamah, the trustworthy advisor.....Yahya son of Ali Al hajooree. And my allah give our Shaykh and his students in Dammaj victory over their enemies. Allahuma ameen.


  14. #14
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Rural California, USA
    Posts
    153

    These so-called clarifications and retractions


    بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

    The fanatics continue to defend falsehood and its people, and we ask Allaah azza wa jall to clarify the truth as truth, and falsehood as falsehood, for us.

    In the issue of the evil fatwaa calling Birmingham, UK, the daar al hijrah for the people of Europe, Ubaid al Jaabiree, may Allaah guide him, tried to clarifiy this fatwaa, as quoted from a website of his fanatical supporters:

    الأمر الرابع: أسأل كثيرًا من أناس في أوروبا أو في دول آسيا في الهند أو غيرها، يفتنون في دينهم من بعض المبتدعة البريلوية هم غلاة المتصوفة من أهل وحدة الوجود وغيرهم.
    فأقول لهم: هاجروا إلى برمنجهام فإن فيها مكتبة سلفية، فإذًا إجابتي لهم ليست مطلقة بأن برمنجهام دار هجرة، فبرمنجهام من مدن بريطانيا، وبريطانيا بلد كافر.


    أنا أدعوهم أن يهاجروا إلى حيث توجد المكتبة، إلى أن يلتحقوا بالمكتبة السلفية هناك، ويسهم في إلقاء الدروس والمحاضرات فيها علماء فضلاء منهم: الشيخ عبد الله بن عبد الرحمن الغديان عضو هيئة كبار العلماء وعضو الإفتاء بالمملكة العربية السعودية، مات-رحمه الله-وهو يلقي فيهم الدروس، فمثل هذه المكتبة تستحق أن يلتحق بها من لا يجد مكانًا يأوي إليه لا سيما إذا كانت لديه رغبة في تحصيل العلم الشرعي لا سيما في أمر العقيدة، والسنة، ومحاربة البدع وأهلها، هذا هو الذي أذكر أني قررته.


    وأكرر إذا كنت قررت خلاف ذلك فهو أحد أمرين:


    1- إما زلة مني.


    2- أو تحريف عليّْ.


    فما كان مني فإني أستغفر الله منه، وما كان تحريفًا لكلامي وتَقَوُّلًا علي فهذا أسأل الله أن يوقفه لخصومتي يوم القيامة.


    وأنا حين أسجل معكم هذا الجواب في هذا اللقاء أخاطب من كان نيِّرًا، ذا بصيرة وتقوى وصلاح وسنة، ولست مجاريًا للسفهاء ولا مماريًا للعلماء أعوذ بالله من ذلك.


    The Forth Point: Many amongst the people in Europe or in the Asian
    States in India or other than it ask; they are put to trial in their
    Religion by some of the innovators from the brelviyyah, they are the
    extremist soofees from the people of Wahdatul Wujood and other than them.
    So I say them (i.e. those put to trial): Make Hijrah to Birmingham because
    Maktabatus Salafiyyah is there. Therefore, my answer to them is not that
    Birmingham is a land of Hijrah
    unrestrictedly, for Birmingham is from the cities of Britain and Britain is a Kaafir Land. I urge them to make Hijrah to where they will find the
    Maktabah, where they will affiliate with Maktabatus Salafiyyah over there
    (in Britrain), and to participate in lessons and muhaadaraat within which
    are scholars of excellence, from them: Ash-Shaikh Abdullaah Bin Abdur
    Rahmaan Al-Ghudiyaan from the Committee of Major Scholars and Fatwah
    Committee of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. He delivered lessons to them and
    has died (rahimahullaah).

    So the likes of this Maktbah is worthy of being affiliated to (for) the one
    who cannot find a place to seek shelter; especially if he has a desire to
    attain knowledge of the Sharee-ah, particularly in the affair of
    Aqeedah,the Sunnah and waging war against innovation and its people.

    This is what I mentioned and I affirm it. And I repeat: if I did
    establish/affirm the opposite of that, then it is one of two affairs:

    [1] It is either a slip/mistake from me or [2] a distortion/
    misrepresentation of (my speech). And that which is from me, then
    indeed I seek the forgiveness of Allaah from it; and that which is a
    distortion/misrepresentation of my speech and a forged saying on me, then I
    ask Allaah to set it aside between me and my adversaries on yaumul
    qiyaamah. "

    So this type of "tawbah" or "bayaan" is in actuality a scheming, opportunistic, political move that the fanatics have spread as a "clarification." In reality, nobody forged any statement on Ubaid al-Jaabiree, as he passes the blame to others and acts like he is the one being oppressed. This fatwaa of falsehood was witnessed by others, where he labeled Birmingham, UK, "daar al hijrah for the people of Europe," not merely advising some brothers to migrate there as some have tried to portray.

    So we wait for al-Jaabiree to clearly admit he was wrong and affirm the opposite, that it is not dar al hijrah at all, and it was falsehood to call it that, and, as shaikh Yahyaa hafeedahullaah and others have stated, that he realizes he is not fit for passing fataawaa. When abul Hasan al-Ash'aaree repented for his deviations, the 'ulamaa of that time forbade him from teaching and passing rulings, even after he made tawbah, and they did not look at his writings such as al-Ibaanah until after he died. This should be our example. But instead, al-Jaabiree is following in the footsteps of the hizbiyoon like al-Maribee and his companion al-Adanee, by diminishing these deviant fataawaa as, "slips of the tongue", and giving excuses over and over like, "if we intended this, then...", and using other false techniques such as taking the mujmal over the mufassal. This is the deen of Allaah azza wa jall, and there is no room for this nonsense!

    “Umar ibn al-Khattaab, rahimahullaah, said, "There is no excuse for anyone going astray thinking that he is upon guidance. Nor for abandoning guidance thinking it to be misguidance, since the affairs have been made clear, the proof established and the excuse cut off. That is because the Sunnah and the Jamaa'ah have consolidated and safeguarded all of the Religion. It has been made clear to the people, so it is upon the people to comply and follow.”

    Al-Jaabiree also turned this so-called clarification into another attack on the people who exposed and refuted him. This situation is also similar to the so-called retraction of Abdullaah al-Bukhaaree, the slanderer of Imaam al-Wadi'ee raheemahullaah:

    "…And if there was in it (i.e. in my speech concerning Shaykh Muqbil) any delusion, then
    we free ourselves to Allah, Exalted and Honoured is He from it. And if it portrayed a
    corrupt meaning, then we seek refuge in Allah from that corrupt meaning……………….........
    And we conclude from this by freeing ourselves to Allah from what this expression has
    mislead by way of corrupt meaning, and that the Shaykh is excluded from the likes of these
    expressions. And we seek the forgiveness of Allah, Exalted and High is He, if this expression
    has given a false impression to this corrupt meaning. For this is the meaning that was
    intended, and we haven't ceased to be from those who glorify the Shaykh and
    acknowledge his virtue and his leadership. Rather, I used to say - and many from the
    brothers have heard this more than once-: the Shaykhs graduation from the university is
    considered to be a glorious achievement from the glorious achievements of the
    university…....”

    Shaikh Hasan bin Qaasim ar-Raymee hafeedahullaah stated in his radd of al-Bukhaaree: "I say: This is just like the way of the tricksters, when they are tied up, cornered and their exposure comes close, and when their impotence, weakness of their intellect, shallowness of their knowledge and their bad manners become exposed, they turn towards trickery and try to convince others that their intention was not this and that, rather it was this and that. Verily he did well, the one who said: “The two year old she-camel, if it is not pulled tight with rope It is not able to carry the load of the eight year old camel of burden And the condition of our fellow friend (i.e. Dr. Al-Bukhaaree) is like the condition of AlWassaabee (Muhammad Bin Abdul-Wahaab Al-Wassaabee) of Al-Hudaidah, that is, when all of the people had become aware of his slander of Al-‘Allaamah Rabee' Al-Madkhalee and his accusations of him being a spy, he ran and hurried in excusing himself from As-Shaykh Rabee' out of fear that he would talk about him. And that is in accordance to what he thought, but the Miskeen doesn’t know that Shaykh Rabee' has given his honour to Allah, as is the condition of the well grounded scholars... Thirdly: It is absolutely necessary for him to clearly announce this mistake of his and to repent from it without having trickery as there comes in his statement: “…And if there was in it (i.e. In my speech concerning Shaykh Muqbil) any delusion…” So rather he should say: 'I made a mistake concerning such and such, and I repent to Allah in regards to that'. As for the trickery, then we are sick and tired of it, just as other than us from the people of justice were sick and tired of it from Abul-Hasan in regards to his acclaimed 'repentance' regarding the things that were taken against him." (End of shaikh's speech)

    In addition, Ubaid al Jaabiree made a so-called clarification regarding his evil speech on the great sahaabi, Ka'b bin Maalik, radi-Allaahu ta'ala anhu, where he used the evil language to describe him as as daall, mudill (misguided who misguides others), or that Ka'b bin Maalik radi-Allaahu 'anhu feared specifically about himself due to the boycotting that he was a daall, mudill, a claim in which he gives no proof regarding. In a similar pattern to his so-called tawbah on the evil fatwa of hijrah to Birmingham, he said:

    "I have said in which the meaning is, that I have distinguished the two affairs. I said that Kaa’b radiallaahu ‘anhu feared that he dies upon misguidance this no doubt there is no disagreement between the scholars, he didn’t feel this except having fear of dying upon misguidance so it is obligatory to distinguish that if he died before the Messenger sallallaahu ‘alaihi wa sallam then this is in the knowledge of the unseen whether revelation would be revealed to the Prophet sallallaahu ‘alaihi wa sallam revealing his innocence or not.However, If the Messenger sallallaahu ‘alaihi wa sallam died then the revelation stops with his death so If the Messenger died while Kaa’b was boycotted then he would have been in that state there is no doubt in this is what must be understood and this is what I hold."

    Allaahul musta'aan! In this so-called retraction/clarification, there is even more speculation, speaking without knowledge, and specifically speaking about an affair that goes against what Allaah ta'ala willed, which is what actually happened- that Ka'b was forgiven by Allah ta'ala- so what is the benefit and need to speculate on the affair of his state if he would have died before the aayah forgiving him? This only results in more ill speech- and it reveals that Ubaid al Jaabiree holds that Ka'b bin Maalik (radi-Allaahu anhu) may have been misguided/astray during the time he was boycotted because the aayah forgiving him was not sent down yet, or that Ka'b radi-allaahu anhu feared this ruling upon himself due to the boycott, which is a statement given without any textual proofs. Not to mention that for us to speak like this of a companion leads to having evil thoughts of a great, distinguished sahaabi, when we are to only have good thoughts of them at all times.

    Shaikh al Islaam ibn Taymiyyah states in Aqeedah al Wasatiyyah: Moreover, if anyone of them (as-Sahabah) committed any act of offense, without doubt he repented from it, or he did good deeds which wiped that offense from him, or he has been forgiven for the virtue of accepting Islam from its start or by intercession of Muhammad (peace be upon him) since they are deserving most his intercession, or a calamity inflicted upon him in this world which covered for that offense. But if this is the case in actual offenses, what about matters in which they were mujtahids (formulating independent decision in legal or theological matters)? If they were correct in their ijtihaad they will receive double reward and if they missed they will receive one reward and the missing is forgiven for them.

    Furthermore, the objectionable amount of their deeds is negligible in comparison to their virtues, their merit is in belief in Allah and His Messenger, the jihad in His Path, the Hijrah (emigration) from Makkah to al-Madinah, the support for the Prophet and the faith, the valuable knowledge and the good deeds. Whoever studies the life of the Sahabah objectively, with insight and with what Allah bestowed upon them of virtues, will no doubt discover that they are the best of all people after the Prophet (peace be upon him), that there never was and never will be their like and that indeed they are the choicest of the generations of the 'Ummah which is in itself the best of all nations and the most honorable in the eyes of Allah ,The Exalted."

    Where is the proof that Ka'b radi-Allaahu anhu was ever considered- or considered himself- due to this boycott specifically, that he was daall, mudill- a label that is attributed to innovators and disbelievers? Did any of the other companions say this against him during the hajr? Rather, even his cousin Abu Qatadah radi-Allaahu anhu did not refer to him as daall, mudill, even during the boycott. Narrated Abdullaah the son of Ka'b, may Allaah be pleased with them, that Ka'b radiallaahu anhu narrated his story to him: "
    When this harsh attitude of the people lasted long, I walked till I scaled the wall of the garden of Abu Qatada who was my cousin and dearest person to me, and I offered my greetings to him. By Allah, he did not return my greetings. I said, ‘O Abu Qatada! I beseech you by Allah! Do you know that I love Allah and His Apostle?’ He kept quiet. I asked him again, beseeching him by Allah, but he remained silent. Then I asked him again in the Name of Allah. He said, “Allah and His Apostle know it better.’ Thereupon my eyes flowed with tears and I returned and jumped over the wall.” [Saheeh al Bukhaaree 5:59:702, and Saheeh Muslim]

    Therefore, we should fear Allaah and not speak in a matter of deen where we are not preceded by a proof from the salaf as saalih. We should also take heed of the hadeeth: “When my companions are mentioned, then withhold.” Related by at-Tabaraanee and see Silsilatul-ahadeeth-is-Saheehah.

    Imagine, the great sahaabi Ka'b, radi-Allaahu ta'ala anhu, the honest one who distinguished himself from the munaafiqeen losers who made excuses, a man who had revelation sent down about him from ar-rabb al 'aalameen, Who forgave him and the other two, a man who was personally praised and congratulated by the messenger of Allaah, sallallaahu 'alayhi wasallam, we indeed love him and all the sahaabah, but there are those in our times who have the audacity to speak about him in this humiliating way, devoid of authentic proofs. We seek refuge in Allaah from this misguidance.


    So let us not be fooled by the fanatics who declare these tricks and ploys to be "crystal clear" clarifications "as clear as the sun in the sky". What in reality did these statements clear up or retract? They only reiterated the falsehoods of Ubaid Al-Jabiree. Still others will defend Ubaid al Jaabiree but are silent on the sahaabi Ka'b bin Maalik, radi-Allaahu 'anhu. This so-called retraction is just another slander, just in different words. We ask these fanatics again, would you rather defend Ka'b bin Maalik radi-Allaahu 'anhu or Ubaid al Jaabiree? We ask Allaah for safety and steadfastness on the truth.



  15. #15
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    34
    Jazakallahu khairan ya akhana mohsin, kalaam jameel.

  16. #16
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Rural California, USA
    Posts
    153
    Baarakallaahu feekum akhee Fahd, and to the brothers of this distinguished forum.

    Here is another beneficial file for the reference of the brothers on this topic of Ubaid al Jaabiree's deceit, treachery and plotting, may Allaah guide him.

    Exposing `Ubaid Al-Jabiree's Jaahiliyah and blatant lies! by al-'Allaamah sh-shaikh Yahyaa al Haajooree hafeedahullaah


  17. #17
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Rural California, USA
    Posts
    153

    Imaam Al-Barbahaaree, raheemahullaah said:
    "Know that leaving the correct path occurs in two ways.

    Firstly : that a man strays from the correct path intending nothing but good, so his error is not to be followed since it leads to destruction.

    Secondly: a man who deliberately opposes the truth and acts contrary to the Pious ones who came before him, he is astray, leading others astray, a rebellious devil within the Ummah. It is a duty upon those who know of him to warn the people against him and to explain his condition to them so that no one falls into his innovation and is destroyed."
    __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ ___________________

    Question: Here in Morocco, there are Salafees from the ordinary people, who say Shaykh Ubayd is a great scholar, i.e., nothing should be said about him over this fitnah.

    Sheikh Hasan bin Qaasim Al-Hasanee Ar-Raymee hafidhahullah replied:

    Bismillah ar-Rahman ar-raheem peace and blessing be upon our prophet and on all his companions, Amma ba'd

    "Shaykh Ubayd (May Allah forgive us and him) certainly came to Yemen to defend this gang of Hizbiyyeen [al-'Adani and his supporters who started the new hizb and split up the salafiyeen]. The first time he visited Yemen Shaykh Muhammad Abdul-Wahab al Wassabi was among those who complained about his coming. (May Allah forgive us and him) and he advised other mashaykh to not welcome him and this is known. And this time when that happened, [after the disagreement] between Shaykh Muhammad al-Wassabi and Shaykh Yahya, he [al-Wassaabi] is hosting him. Because Shaykh Ubayd announced he would defend them and that he would help them if they wanted assistance in this issue.

    It was announced at the very beginning: That he [al-Jaabiree] was going to visit Shihr (Abdullah Al 'Adeni), Aden (from Abdur-Rahman Al' Adeni) and Hudaydah (Muhammad Al Wassabi).

    This raises the question: Why these centers and not others? Why these particular centers and not others, if we can call them centers.

    Why these particular centers? and not the other centers of Ahl Sunnah?

    Why has there not been in the advertisement the call to brotherhood, unity, love, wellbeing and a hungry for good, why has it not he been said is this visit to Yemen and the centers of Yemen? Have those who prepared this visit sought the advice of the scholars to whom we must look for Fataawaa, here in Yemen? These questions must be put to them .... And we know the answers. The reality is that he came to defend and lend a hand to those, without there has been no advice beforehand. If Shaykh Ubayd really was fair and had the truth, as he claims in this fitnah, he would have met Shaykh Yahya, and this is recommended! And maybe that Allah would have opened the heart of Shaykh Ubayd and he would have understood the case. And he would have understood the cunning [ways] of this band (Al 'Adeni and his supporters) who hosted and who opposes the Call to Salafiyah in Dammaj.

    But the reality is that unfortunately, this is a case plotted! And we must not believe that a human being is immune [from] disorders. And in fact warning against Dammaj is to warn against what is profitable.

    I pose a question: Dammaj the center of Imam Al Waadi'ee (rahimahullah) Isn’t the Book of Allah taught there? Isn’t the Sunnah of the Prophet (Peace and blessings of Allah be upon him)? Isn’t the creed taught there? Usool ath-Thalaatha, Kaashf Shubuhat, Kitab ul Tawhid, Al Wasitiyah, Al luma’a, Al Hamawiyah, Attadmuriyah, At Tahawiyah.

    Are these books taught? So the making of a warning against Dammaj is making a real warning against what is being taught of truth. You have to understand that! He who warns against Dammaj should fear Allah. And that's why Sheikh Rabee', our Sheikh (May Allah preserve him), does not agree with these words (the warning of Shaykh Ubayd on Dammaj) And no one with reason, can be in accord with that.

    And the scholars in Yemen, may Allah give them success, responded to that and it was said it did made him (Shaykh Ubayd) unhappy that people said it was wrong.

    And Sheikh Ubayd actually since the last time, I mean... We no longer know what we can say about him... Other than he opposes, with a fierce opposition the Salafi movement in Yemen.

    Especially since he recently said that some of the scholars have "have things with them" referring to Shaykh Al Imam and Shaykh (Abdul Azeez) Al Bura'ee.

    Okay ...... ! They have things ... show them to us! Because religion is advice.
    The prophet peace and blessings of Allah be upon him said: "Religion is advice"! But you hide like this: "They have things " Come on, show us.

    So what is the call of Shaykh Ubayd to salafiyyah in Yemen? That is the question being posed. What is Shaykh Ubayd’s call to Salafiyah in Yemen and its preachers that were recommended by Shaykh Muqbil (rahimahullah)? In any case, it is not the case that a person can spend time in Dawah and scholarship then one can take his words like that .. NO... A person can deviate! And you know the story of Karabissi and how he was (in science and knowledge) and Imam Ahmed bin Hanbal has warned against him when he said that the Qur'aan was created.

    And so, the preachers who oppose the Dawah, the truth, the Salafi movement in Yemen or anywhere [we] may indeed be afraid for them. It is hoped that Shaykh Ubayd still comes to his senses and he is reviewing his words and tries to do well and correct his actions and he finishes them in the land.

    By Allah it is a disaster! Ya Shaykh Ubayd fear Allah! By Allah it is a disaster that your life can be finished on a warning on a Center that the world has learned so much blessing. I do not speak about only Yemen, but throughout the world.

    And even if my Shaykh is Shaykh Ubayd, however the truth is more deserving to be followed. Although Sheikh Ubayd is loved, the truth is closer to us. And although he talked about me with words that we should not mention, may Allah forgive us and him.

    But the truth has no right to be defended? And in this we do not defend our person, but by Allah it is to defend the truth.

    And the fact is that he warned against Dammaj and Sheikh Yahya, and spoke bad about some scholars, is a bad omen by Allah ... it is ominous.

    And you probably know, what has been reported on Al Hafiz ibn Aasakir (rahimahullah) said

    "And know that the chair of the scholars is poisonous and subhanallah wa ta’ala reveals all in time those who fall"

    And he also said

    "He who gives free rein to his tongue to talk badly on the scholars, Allah subhanhu ta’ala, will bring death to his heart before he dies"

    A man may attain a degree in scholarship but to Allah belongs the beginning and the end of all things

    That is why the Prophet peace and blessings of Allah be upon him in Tirmidhi narrated by Abi Salama, "The most repeated Dua of the Prophet, (peace and blessings be upon him)- was

    "O the one who changes hearts, strengthen firmly my heart on your religion"

    Yes, baaraka Allahu fikum

    Actions speak for their purposes.

    And billahi alaykum, by Allah, tell me? Warn against a center that contains over 10,000 students: Among those who learned the Qur'aan and those who learned the books of the Sunnah, or some of them and among those who teach and those who learn etc ... and women.

    Bi Allahi alaykum (frankly) this word (the warning of Shaykh Ubayd against Dammaj) Is it right or wrong? This speech is really unfair! Nobody can agree, neither men nor jinns.

    Except those with no sense. These words, as stated by the scholars of Yemen, is in agreement with and is content with that of people of falsehood among the Sufis, Shiites and hizbiyyeen."

    End Quote

    The tape "Liqah 'Maftooh" by Shaykh Hasan bin Qaasim Al-Hasanee Ar-Raymee hafidhaahullah he is the author of the book Al-Adillat-ush-Shar’eeyah li-Kash’fit Talbeesaat al-Hizbiyyah ‘alal-Mujtami’aat [Religious Evidences Exposing the Misconceptions of the Partisans on Muslim Societies] that Features an Introduction by Shaykh Muqbil Al-Waadi’ee and Ishraaqatu Uleen-Nuhaa fee Hukmil-Akhadh minal-Lihaa [Illuminating the Intellectuals on the Ruling of Trimming the Beard] with intro by Shaykhs Yahyaa Al-Hajooree and Ahmad An-Najmee. Shaykh Raymee Hafidhahullah was a student of Shaykh Muqbil (rahimahullah) he also studied in Madinah and is known in Saudi Arabia and Yemen for his center in Ta'iz and for his writings in the defense of Salafi Manhaj


  18. #18
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Rural California, USA
    Posts
    153

    How can it be that some individuals claiming salafiyyah will go all out and refute some misguided jaahil who allows children to watch a magician perform magic tricks, but will continue to ignore the fact that their own shaikh (Ubaid al Jaabiree) permits going to a magician and even paying him to remove the magic spells?

    We seek refuge in Allaah from hizbiyyah and blinded love for individuals over the truth.

  19. #19
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Rural California, USA
    Posts
    153

    Ubaid al Jaabiree's love of the hizbiyeen and his hatred for ahl as sunnah has continued to lead him astray. Recently (a few days ago) on a website where many of these hizbiyoon post (who blindly follow him and others as if they are infallible), he shows that he is even more harsh upon shaikh Yahyaa (may Allaah preserve him) than he is towards Alee al Halabee. Recently again he called Shaikh Yahyaa, the misguided innovator, the idiot, the fool

    "الحجوري الضال المبتدع الأحمق السفيه."
    (we seek refuge in Allaah)

    As collected in the Saheeh of Imaam al Bukhaaree, rahimahullaah, the Abu Hurairah radiallaahu anhu narrated the rasoolullaah sallallaahu 'alayhi wasallam said,

    من عادى لي وليا فقد أذنته بالحرب


    We ask Allaah to guide al-Jaabiree or break his back


  20. #20
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Rural California, USA
    Posts
    153

    Ubaid al Jaabiree allows playing football/soccer to earn a living

    Ubaid al Jaabiree's fatwaa PERMITTING EARNING A LIVING PLAYING FOOTBALL (OR SOCCER) under certain conditions like covering the awrah, not finding other work

    http://aloloom.net/vb/showthread.php?t=17910


    Ash Shaykh Muqbil ,may Allaah have mercy upon him, was asked what is the ruling on playing Soccer ?

    A: As for playing soccer then it is a must that one knows the outcome of it (before playing it) and it is also a must that one knows the reason for it(the game soccer) was imported to the lands of the Muslims. Playing soccer or playing in general is not haraam if you give yourself time (to play such as) an hour or a half so you can become energetic to read( to complete one studies) this is the case if you do not find a job of physical labor but as for if you are farmer or you posses a job of physical labor then you should start with it due to it being an exercise. As for if you do not find any physical labor then it is okay( to play soccer ).

    The enemies of Islaam… brought the game soccer (to the lands of the Muslims) in order to divert the youth from learning the Quraan and the Sunnah…

    The Reference is the Book: Qam'ul Maanid, page: 397, print: Daarulhadeeth

    Also ash Shaykh Albaani , may Allaah have mercy upon him, has mentioned in his tape"al Lahwu" that playing soccer becomes haraam if it leads to enmity between those playing or if the awrah of those playing becomes apparent.

    Also ash-shaikh Yahyaa, hafidahullaah, and other than him from the people of knowledge, May Allah preserve them, have warned against soccer many times and mentioned the harms that are found in it, from them:

    1: The lack of loving and hating for the sake of Allah:

    You like and support a specific soccer player because of the way he plays or because of his tricks that he uses during the game but in reality he is a disbeliever in Allah, the Most High and in the Last Day. But you do not think about this because you are too busy trying to win the game!!

    2: Lack of Good Manners and Etiquettes:

    From the things which are well- known in soccer is that the person who has good manners and etiquettes, once he gets on the pitch he's a totally different person from the aspect of manners and etiquettes. If he sees someone who is not playing good he will shout at him and raise his voice at him and perhaps even curse him even if he is own Muslim brother!!! Allahul-Must'aan.

    3: The Revealing of the `Awrah

    When he wants to play football he would put on tight shorts which reveal the knee and a part of his thigh and it has come upon the authority of Ibn Abbaas, may Allah be pleased with him, that the messenger of Allah, peace be upon him, said: "The thigh is `Awrah" – reported by Al-Bukhari in his 'Saheeh'.

    4: Waste of Time

    It is a big waste of time, you are not in the remembrance of Allah, nor in His Worship, nor seeking knowledge, nor doing any righteous actions rather you're in a state of heedlessness, probably falling into sin whilst you know not. As, for those that claim that it is only exercise then they are advised to try something which does not include the disobedience of Allah, the Most High and has no doubt in it, and also to look after that which will benefit him in the hereafter and bring him closer to Allah. For verily the messenger of Allah, peace be upon him, said:

  21. #21
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Rural California, USA
    Posts
    153

    Listen to the audio- Ubayd al Jaabiree allows learning from hizbiyeen


    فتوى الجابري في جواز طلب العلم عند حزبيين وكذلك سماع أشرطة سروري

    DOWNLOAD ATTACHMENT BELOW (ARABIC)
    Ubaid al Jaabiree gives a fatwaa permitting seeking knowledge from the hizbiyeen in their masajid if one needs to and cannot find salafis teaching, "with caution", and allows listening to the cassette tapes of a suroori, followed up by the statement of the Allaamah ash-shaikh Muhammad bin Saalih al Uthaimeen rahimahullaah on this subject


    Ash-shaikh al-Allaamah Muqbil rahimahullah was asked about listening to the tapes of the innovators, and he said this will distract from learning of beneficial knowledge from the Qur'aan and sunnah and for the non-Arabs the Arabic language, rather we should listen to the tapes of ahl as sunnah like Shaikh Bin Baaz or Shaikh al Albaani or the likes and leave off listening to these tapes of the innovators and hizbiyeen, rather the one who claims to be salafi and listens to these tapes is either a deceiver or is trying to misguide others like the youth in issues such as jihaad.

    Attached Files Attached Files

  22. #22
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Rural California, USA
    Posts
    153
    What an evil fatwaa!

    How is it possible for someone in need of knowledge to learn from ahl al bid'ah "with caution" as a condition of his sitting with ahl al bidah

    If mountains of knowledge should not sit and listen to ahl al bid'ah as is clear from the narrations of the salaf as saalih, what about a beginner?

    As shaikh Abu Amr al Hajoori hafidahullaah warned the brothers when he came to Canada almost seven years ago, do not think that you can learn from the people of innovation, and be able to filter out the bid'ah, for every bid'ah you may be able to find, you will miss 10 and learn it and make it part of your deen,

    wallaahul musta'aan

  23. #23
    بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

    UBAYD AL JAABIRI DECLARES AN ADULTERESS TO BE A DISBELIEVER

    Baarakallaah fheekum oh shaykh of ours this is question ten from Britain.

    The female questioner says : is it correct that the husband of my mum considered a muhaaram to me? I was raised with since I was four years old and he is a Christian but he does not practice his religion.


    the answer :

    (al-jaabiri the misguided shaykh) maybe that her mother is (also) a Christian.

    (student) apparently oh shaykh her mother is not a Christian but her father is.

    ( al jabiri the misguided shaykh) how does a muslim woman marry a Christian??? This is disbelief and appostacy.
    I say, it is apparent that you are a muslim so do not remain with this Christian, even if she was married to him. And if your mother is a muslim it is upon her to leave and to make it clear to this Christian, and not to remain with him and if she remained with him after this speech then relay to her the Greetings (Assalaam) if, if she is a muslim relay to her the greetings (Assalaam) and to not remain in the bonds of this Christian for verily if she remained after this she is a disbeliever and an apostate and because you (the questioner) are a muslim you have to leave – May Allaah bless you – he is not considered a mahram to you. Because he is not a muslim. Yes .

    I abu abdurahman say…

    بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

    where are the ones that try to portray gheera for the religion, the ones that took on a task of writing 100 observations that lacked a single genuine observation and then overlook a catastrophe like this?

    billaahi alaykum where is the fairness in these individuals ???

    or maybe they are just trying to equal with this 100 observations to the majmuu’ al fatawa of falsehood which has been made of the fatawa of the mufti of misguidance ubayd al jaabiri?

    the wicked mufti allows entering music classes, declares muslims disbelievers because of major sins, makes it permissible for male doctors to examine the private parts of women and the list goes on.
    why is there not a single clarification of these wicked statements on your khalafi.com or associates websites of these calamities?
    Fatwa after fatwa of misguidances when will it stop???
    When will those people understand this man is not fit to give fatawaa?


    Allaahul Musta’aan

    post taken from
    http://aloloom.net/vb/showthread.php?t=20032




  24. #24
    AL JABIRI AGREES WITH THE MADHAB OF THE MURJI’AH CONCERNING THE DISOBEDIENT MUSLIM.
    WITH THAT WHICH HE ASCRIBES TO THE PEOPLE OF INNOVATIONS WITH FULL EMAAN.

    بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم



    إن الحمد لله نحمده و نستعينه ونستغفره، ونعوذ بالله من شرور أنفسنا، ومن سيّئات أعمالنا، من يهده الله فلا مضلّ له، ومن يضلل فلا هادي له، وأشهد ألا إلهٰ إلاّ الله وحده لا شريك له، وأشهد أنّ محمّدًا عبده ورسوله.
    أما بعد:


    This is another fatwa of innovation in the chain of fatawa al jabiriyyah al khalafiyyah in his war against the dawah of salafiyyah.
    When he was asked (may Allaah guide him ) :

    is it justified for whomever writes in refutations upon the Jamaatul tableegh or there likes from the groups that he describes them as brothers from the angle of being gentleness and kind to the one being called?

    al jabiris reply

    The brotherhood of emaaniyyah is established with us for them, the innovators are misguided but with this we don’t strip them of full belief ( al emaan al kaamil).Na'am.

    The source( the website of meraath al anbiyaa: chapter ; beliefs and menhaj/ innovations and newly invented )

    ** ** **

    Verily al jaabiri has treaded in this fatwa the path that is treaded by the people of al muwazanaat and took the path of the madhab of the misguided murji’ah concerning the disobedient believer.
    1, concerning the path of the people of muwazanaat:
    verily proceeded the declaration of his implementation of it(in this fatwah) in the fifth section of the third chapter of my book (الحجج الكاشفة- the revealing proofs)
    2, concerning his agreeing to the Murji’ah
    is when he the jabiri ubaid agreed with full clarity in this fatwa, that the people of innovation from the jamaah of tableegh and there likes from the jamaah al bid’iyyah (innovated groups) does not strip them from total beliefs ( al emaan al kaamil) with their misguidance. So innovation and misguidance does not harm -with him- Al-Emaan. When he said “ and the innovaters are misguided but with this we do not strip them of full beliefs ( al emaan al kaamil)”!!!




    so I say while seeking aid from Allaah (shaykh yusuf al jaziree)


    Know may -Allaah give you success- that al fisq and its people are of two types:
    Ibnu al-Qayyim -may Allaah have mercy on him- said it(al fisq) is of two types :
    fisq from the angle of actions and fisq from the angle of belief.
    and fisq of actions is of two types : coupled with disobedience and singular.
    fisq of the belief : like fisq of the people of innovations, those that believe in Allah and His messenger and the last day, who make haram what Allaah made haram, make obligatory that Allaah made obligatory but they deny a lot what Allaah and His messenger confirmed, in ignorance and in wrongful interpretations and in blindfollowing of shuyuukh, and they confirm that which has not been confirmed by Allaah and His messenger…) (almadaarij assaalikeen362-1/361)

    and the beliefs of the Salaf concerning the people of innovations –other than that which necessitates disbelieve – is that they are ahle kabaair (people of major sins) sinners those that lack complete faith and this is because they were from ahle wa’eed ( the people that were warned) like in the hadeeth of the splitting that the Prophet of Allaah may the peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him said
    “ Verily the people before you from the people of the Book splitted to 73 different groups verily this millah will split into 73 and 72 are in the fire and 1 in jannah and it is the jamaa’ah”

    And the imam of ahle sunnah Ahmed ibn Hanbal –may Allaah have mercy on him – said: the graves of the major sinner of ahle sunnah are gardens , and the graves of the people of innovations who were ascetics are pits. (tabaqaat al hanaabilah 1/184)

    and ibn Salaah –may Allaah have mercy on him – said “ all innovators are sinners, but not all sinners are innovators “ (fatawa ibnu Salaah pg 28 within mujmu’ah arisaa’il muniriyyah 4th volume)

    And shaykh Rabee – may Allaah grant him success - was asked the question : do we treat the innovators like we treat the sinners in hating and loving, that we love them for what they have with them of emaan and that we hate them for that which they have from innovation?


    the answer:
    that which ahle sunnah agrees and the majority have ruled upon that the innovator are worse than the sinners. The sinner has a character of sinner and the sinner most of the time respects the people of knowledge and the people of virtue and the people of uprightness and he wished that he was connected with them but the innovator is at odds with them and he harms them, and he hates them and he despises the and debases them. And he is worse with no doubt and the Messenger of Allaah said “the evilest of affairs are the newly invented ones” and he said about the khawarij “ they are the evilest of creatures and creation…) … and this who is asking I do not know if he is a salafee or he is deluded with the manhaj of al muwazanaat, ya’nee he loves them for what he has with him of Islaam and he hates him for what he has with him from innovation this is the manhaj of al muwazanaat… (fatawaa fi al aqeedah wa al manhaj) (halaqatul awal)

    so I say:
    if you was going to agree to the fact that the people of innovations –those that don’t necessitate disbelieve – are from the sinners of this ummah, then know that the madhab of the salaf concerning the sinners of the believers that they don’t take away from the them foundation of belief ( asl al emaan) and they don’t give him the name of complete belief (al emaan al kaamil)


    shaykh al islaam ibnu taymiyyah –may Allaah have mercy on him – said in Al Aqeedah Al Waasitiyyah agreeing to the beliefs of ahle sunnah wal jamaah concerning the believing sinner “ that he is a believer incomplete in belief and that he is a believer in his emaan and sinner due to his major sin so he is not given the name in its absolute (al Emaan) and he is not denied the name (al Emaan) in its absolute”
    And he –may Allaah have mercy on him – said : what is correct to be said is: he is a believer incomplete in belief and a believer in his emaan and a sinner due to his major sin and he is not given the name ( al Emaan ) in its absolute because verily the Book and the Sunnah negate the name (al Emaan) in its absolute (to the faasiq)…
    (majmuu’ al fatawaah 7/241)
    and his statement “he is not given the absolute name” : means he is not given the name Al Emaan Kaamil (Full belief) thus his emaan not complete.

    I say: the jaabari ubayd opposed the beliefs of the salaf in this chapter he has included ahle bidah in those that have full emaan – it’s absolute – and this is the core essence of the murji’ah and the jahmiyyah concerning the believing sinner when they gave them complete emaan and they don’t strip them of this like it is in the text of the speech of the jaabari in opposition of what the salaf agreed upon.
    And shaykh al islaam –may Allaah have mercy upon him – said in nullification to what the jaabari ubaid agreed and in clarification of the matching of his (ubaid’s) speech to the murji’ah “ so the people of the sunnah are upon agreement that he (the faasiq the sinner) is stripped of the obligatory full emaan, so some of his obligatory full emaan has left him, but he is from Ahle Wa’eed ( still from the 72 sects, not a disbeliever) verily those who dispute in this are those that say:al emaan does not change from the jahmiyyah and the murji’ah, so they say : he has full emaan” (majmuu’ al fatawa 258/7)
    The stripping that is rejected with them from the believing sinner was the emaan in totality and its foundation, and the stripping which was accepted was the complete emaan in the absoluteness .
    And ibnul Qayyim –may Allaah have mercy upon him – said: Emaan in its totality and total emaan, so total emaan is not attributed except upon the Kaamil (full), the Kaamil (full) which has been ordered. And emaan in totality is attributed to one that is incomplete and one that is full (sinner and other then him).
    That’s why the Prophet may the peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him negated emaan in its absoluteness (al emaan al mutlaq) from the fornicator and the drinker of alcohol and the thief and he didn’t negate the emaan in its totality lest they enter in His statement (وَاللَّهُ وَلِيُّ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ)
    and not in His statement (قَدْ أَفْلَحَ الْمُؤْمِنُونَ)
    nor in his statement(إِنَّمَا الْمُؤْمِنُونَ الَّذِينَ إذا ذُكِرَ اللَّهُ وَجِلَتْ قُلُوبُهُمْ) until the end of the ayah.
    And they enter the statement (فَتَحْرِيرُ رَقَبَةٍ مُؤْمِنَةٍ) or His statement (وَإِنْ طَائِفَتَانِ مِنَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ اقْتَتَلُوا)
    and other examples like this and for this the statement of Allaah
    (قَالَتِ الأعْرَابُ آمَنَّا قُلْ لَمْ تُؤْمِنُوا وَلَكِنْ قُولُوا أَسْلَمْنَا) نفيا للإيمان المطلق، لا لمطلق الإيمان) (badaa’ al fawaaid 17-4/16)
    And speech on this topic is long in that we mentioned is a sufficient indicator – bi idnillaah – to the going astray of the jaabari in this fatwa and his agreeing to the murji’ah in this.

    والله الموفق






    originally posted in the Arabic section by shaykh yusuf ibn eid al I’naabi al jazaairi 10 Thul-Qedah 1434 A.H.
    http://aloloom.net/vb/showthread.php?t=20753


    translated by myself abu abdurahman abdullaah ibnu ahmed

    I abu abdurahman say may Allaah raise the status of shaykh Yusuf al jazaairi and reward him greatly for his beneficial refutations and make it an eye opener for the blind followers of the jaabiri ubaid


  25. #25
    Where is the end of this mufti’s daruurah?

    الحمد لله والصلاة والسلام على رسول الله وعلى آله وصحبه
    ومن والاه والتابعين وتابعيهم ومن اتبع هداه .





    The questioner says:

    I am a secondary school student in which they teach things that oppose the religion, for example freedom of beliefs and democracy and that the earth spins around the sun. And if I reject this from them they do not give it any interest. Is it upon me to continue or to leave the school?
    knowing I am in the last year of secondary school.

    answer

    (the jaabari says)
    here are two situations
    the first situation:
    if you can change from this school which teaches what you have mentioned of disbelieve from freedom of beliefs and democracy to a religiously correct institute where you can obtain the legislated knowledge and the Arabic language, then leave and do not remain
    The second situation:
    that there is no religiously correct institute in your land where you can learn the pure religion and the Arabic language and what a individual needs from history and sports.
    so learn these things from them from the angle of necessity but rejected it with your heart,
    it is obligatory upon you to reject it with your heart and to believe that this is falsehood, and when you finish the secondary school enter into a religious university like the university in madinah al munawarah and the university of imam muhamed ibn suad in riyad. Na’am








    I abu abdurahman say

    la hawla wa la quwata illa billaah what is it with this man? Study disbelief from the angle of daruurah? Allaahul musta’aan , I truly believe the this man has been afflicted with the dua’s of the oppressed ones . Ya Allaah accept the dua of shaykh khalid al khurbaani when he said

    اللهم اكفنا شر هذه المفتى بما شئت وكيف شئت يا رب العالمين


    http://aloloom.net/vb/showthread.php?t=20943

  26. #26
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Rural California, USA
    Posts
    153
    Allaahul musta'aan This thread continues to grow yet al Jaabirees blind followers still act like he is infallible.

    Here is another one from him:

    الجابري يجيز العمل في مزرعة عنب يُعصر خمرا http://aloloom.net/vb/showthread.php?t=20960


    Question: May Allaah reward you wth good sheikh, this is question 23 from Algeria; says: someone who works on a grape farm in a European country and from these grapes some are sold as grapes, others are pressed into wine; What is the ruling on working in this farm?

    Misguided answer from Jaabiri : if he takes part in pressing the grapes into wine it is from impermissible earnings, but if he was working on the farm and he harvests the grapes and delivers them for its owner, he is not held responsible for that (what the owner does), (because) he is not marketing it, he does not sell it, this was not indicated (in the question), leaving it until Allaah allows a way out.'

    Imaam Abu Dawood (3674) and Imaam Ibn Maajah (3380) that Ibn ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: The Messenger of Allaah (blessings and peace of Allaah be upon him) said: “May Allaah curse wine, the one who drinks it, the one who pours it, the one who sells it, the one who buys it, the one who squeezes (the grapes etc), the one for whom it is squeezed, the one who carries it and the one to whom it is carried.” Classed as saheeh by Imaam al-Albaani in Saheeh Imaam Abu Dawood.

    And the permanent committee and others have said that working in this type of situation is aiding in sin and transgression, aiding the one who is cursed, because he is aiding in the haraam by facilitating someone else to do haraam, even if he doesn't do the action directly himself

    We ask Allaah for safety from following the desires and these misguided deviants who lead people astray

  27. #27
    Subhana Allah after all these misguided fatawa yet still these hizbiz hold him as the biggest shaikh of our time. Allahu mustaan may Allah protect us from the people of desires.

  28. #28
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Rural California, USA
    Posts
    153

    Ubaid al Jaabiree al-Hizbee joins Faalih al Harbee al Haddaadi in reckless tabdi'

    Ubaid al Jaabiree al-Hizbee joins Faalih al Harbee al Haddaadi in reckless tabdi' of the salafi 'ulamaa

    Shaikh Ali bin Naasir al Adani wrote:

    So in the end: What's your opinion? That Shaykh 'Ubayd Al-Jaabiree traverses upon the methodology of Faalih Al-Harbee and his Haddaadee way? Since his unjust rulings have become apparent, with declaring innovation and condemning a statement that belongs to a large mass of the 'Ulema by way of falsehood, upon the same way as Faalih Al-Harbee with declaring innovation (upon) the 'Ulema of the Ummah and pulverizing their position by way of falsehood and allegations that are extensive in exaggeration from mention of their mistakes or by way of exaggeration in making apparent everything from his affair that would open the door for their enemies.

    From :
    Is Shaykh 'Ubayd Traversing Upon The Methodology Of Faalih Al-Harbee And His Haddaadee Way? http://aloloomenglish.net/vb/showthr...full=1#post147


    Shaikh Ehsan Ilaahi Dhaheer (Zaheer) al-Punjabi from Pakistan, may Allaah have mercy upon him, was a mujaddid (reviver) of tawheed in Pakistan and a subduer of bid'ah and its people. He was highly praised by the likes of the great 'ulamaa of our time including Shaikh ibn Baz, Shaikh Al-Albani, and Shaikh Muqbil, may Allah have mercy on all of them. In addition to exposing the rawaafid, soofiyyah and the deobandis, he also refuted jamaa'ah al islami, the main ikhwaani organization in the Indian subcontinent. Eventually, he was killed by the enemies of Islaam, thought to be either the rawaafid or the barailwiyyah, may Allaah destroy them. He was buried next to some of the sahaabah's graves in al-Baqee in Madinah.

    Faalih al Harbee, the Haddadi, was quoted on one of the websites of spubs, who are the "lost-found" followers of Faalih

    Faalih stated about Shaikh Ehsan, rahimahullaah:
    I do not know him. I know him to be a siyaasee even when he was in the Jaamiyah al Islaamiyyah but he used to call to the Hadeeth and proclaim that he is a Salafee. Then he was killed Rahimahullah, brought here and buried in Madeenah and considered to be a salafee but I do not recognize that he is a Salafee. We recognize him to be from the siyaasees who passed out from the Jamaah al Islamiyyah with the ideology of the Ikhwaan al Muslimeen and siyaasiyyeen. But he also affiliated himself to the Ahl ul-Hadeeth and those who aided him were Ahl ul-Hadeeth and those who shouted behind him and did demonstrations on the streets were Ahl al Hadeeth.

    This is remarkably similar to what the shaikh of Hizbul Jadeed, the slanderer of Ka'b bin Malik radi-Allaaahu Anhu, none other than Ubayd al Jaabiree stated when asked about Shaikh Ehsan. Both stated they dont know him or that his affairs were hidden to them, yet proceeded to give the baatil fatwaa, making tabdee' based on perceived mistakes:

    Yes yes the man is ikhwani from what I know the man excelled in what which
    relates to the shi'ah. He exposed their condition very well as for other
    than that then his affairs are hidden from us except that we know that he
    is ikhwani.


    When asked about his books and tapes, the inconsistent and confused ubaid
    answered:

    I don't think they will benefit you may Allah bless you the man is ikhwani

    Then he was asked, "but he has books on the shiah?"

    (n.b. Shaikh Ehsan's books were recommended and praised by the ulamaa.
    Even sheikh rabee, waffaqahullaah, wrote an introduction to one of his
    books)

    The hizbi slanderer, the fickle mufti Ubaid suddenly changed his mind and answered,

    his books on the shiah to be benefited from from what I know.

    And when asked about selling his books and tapes, the big hizbi Ubaid said they
    should be prevented from being sold, except the ones on the shia.

    So now again we see the amazing similarity of the manhaj of these haddadis, Faalih Al Harbi
    and Ubaid Al Jaabiri, and by extension spubs.

    We say, as the ulama stated, that Shaikh Ehsan was salafi, not ikhwani or
    siyaasi as these haddaadees have claimed. He made some mistakes, but as
    Imam an-nawawi and imaam ibn Hajr and others fell into mistakes, but they
    are still considered upon the sunnah, and they were known to leave off the
    mistakes when the truth came to them.

    Shaikh Ehsan was an asset to people of sunnah, and much like shaikh Muqbil,
    many people left bid'ah and returned to the sunnah through his dawah to
    Allah azza wa jall. However, the same hizb that accused Imam Muqbil of
    being khaarijee, and Shaikh Yahyaa of being the worst type of evil
    imaginable, accuse the Mujaddid of the Indian subcontinent to be an ikhwani.

    We ask Allah for steadfastness and not forsaking the sunnah and it's people.



 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to Top